A Comparison of Presidential Threshold Systems in Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections in Indonesia and Brazil

Authors

  • Muhammad Zhafran Shobirin Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia Author
  • Moh Akbar Adhiyanto Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia Author
  • Sholeh Hoddin Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia Author
  • Khabib Syaikhu Rohman Faculty of Humanities Mohammed bin Zayed University for Humanities, United Arab Emirates Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i1.7

Keywords:

Presidential Threshold , Elections, Indonesia, Brazil

Abstract

The purpose of this comparison is the reconstruction of the law. The requirements for future presidents and vice presidential candidates are listed in Article 6a, paragraph 2. However, the pros and cons of this rule are still often raised, as it reduces the individual's right to stand as president and vice president, thus requiring legislative amendments. This research uses a method of normative law research, where the approach used in this research is a legal approach and a comparative approach. The threshold in Brazil is different from Indonesia. According to J. Mark Payne, when discussing the threshold in the presidential election, what is meant is the condition of a presidential candidate to be elected president. The threshold for elected presidents in Brazil with 50% + 1 vote is laid down in Article 147. In Indonesia, such a limit is a condition for the nomination of a President and Vice-President to advance in the contest for the election of the President and Vice-Presidents. In contrast, the threshing limit for nomination for the President of the Republic of Indonesia is in Article 222, which stipulates that the pair of candidates must be proposed by the political party or association of political parties participating in the election and meet the requirement to obtain 20% (twenty percent) of the number of seats in the House of Representatives or 25% (Twenty-five percent) from the national valid votes in the previous election of members of the House.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albertson, Bethany, and Kimberly Guiler. “Conspiracy Theories, Election Rigging, and Support for Democratic Norms.” Research & Politics 7, no. 3 (July 28, 2020): 205316802095985. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020959859.

Amalinda Savirani. “Post-Election Politics in Indonesia: Between Economic Growth and Increased Islamic Conservatism.” In Southeast Asian Affairs 2020, 137–54. ISEAS Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814881319-009.

Ambarwati, Sinta Devi, M. Roziq Saifulloh, and Stella M.S. Aritonang. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Pemilu Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 1, no. 5 (August 17, 2020): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i5.213.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/.

Arif Sugitanata. “Dynamics of Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding The Age Limits of Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates.” Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 4, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.24239/qaumiyyah.v4i2.79.

Buehler, Michael, Ronnie Nataatmadja, and Iqra Anugrah. “Limitations to Subnational Authoritarianism: Indonesian Local Government Head Elections in Comparative Perspective.” Regional & Federal Studies 31, no. 3 (May 27, 2021): 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1918388.

Bustamante, Thomas, and Emílio Peluso Neder Meyer. “Legislative Resistance to Illiberalism in a System of Coalitional Presidentialism: Will It Work in Brazil?” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 9, no. 3 (September 2, 2021): 342–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2021.1942370.

Butt, Simon, and Fritz Siregar. “Multilayered Oversight: Electoral Administration in Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, no. S1 (December 1, 2021): S121–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.32.

Daly, Tom Gerald. “Understanding Multi-Directional Democratic Decay: Lessons from the Rise of Bolsonaro in Brazil.” The Law & Ethics of Human Rights 14, no. 2 (November 25, 2020): 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2020-2014.

Freire, Alessandro, and Mathieu Turgeon. “Random Votes under Compulsory Voting: Evidence from Brazil.” Electoral Studies 66 (August 2020): 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102168.

Huerta Yero, Eduardo Javier, Nilton Cesar Sacco, and Maria do Carmo Nicoletti. “Effect of the Municipal Human Development Index on the Results of the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections.” Expert Systems with Applications 168 (April 2021): 114305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114305.

Karmanis, Karmanis. “ELECTRONIC-VOTING (E-VOTING) DAN PEMILIHAN UMUM (Studi Komparasi Di Indonesia, Brazil, India, Swiss Dan Australia).” MIMBAR ADMINISTRASI FISIP UNTAG Semarang 18, no. 2 (October 30, 2021): 11. https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v18i2.2526.

Khalyubi, Wildhan, and Aditya Perdana. “Electoral Manipulation Informationally on Hoax Production in 2019 Presidential and Vice Presidential Election in Indonesia.” Journal of Government and Political Issues 1, no. 2 (November 20, 2021). https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v1i2.17.

Lathifah, Anthin, Abu - Hapsin, Ahmad Rofiq, and M. Arief Hidayatullah. “The Construction of Religious Freedom in Indonesian Legislation: A Perspective of Maqāṣid Ḥifẓ Al-Dīn.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 369. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.10957.

Layton, Matthew L., Amy Erica Smith, Mason W. Moseley, and Mollie J. Cohen. “Demographic Polarization and the Rise of the Far Right: Brazil’s 2018 Presidential Election.” Research & Politics 8, no. 1 (January 28, 2021): 205. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168021990204.

M.D., Pradeep. “Legal Research- Descriptive Analysis on Doctrinal Methodology.” International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences 4, no. 2 (2019): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0075.

Mas’udah, Al Mas’udah Al. “The Presidential Threshold As An Open Legal Policy In General Elections In Indonesia.” Prophetic Law Review 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 176–85. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol2.iss1.art3.

Muhammad Ali Farhan. “Application of Presidential Threshold In Indonesia And Comparison With Several Countries.” YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains 18, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v18i1.124.

Nalle, Victor Imanuel W. “The Relevance of Socio-Legal Studies in Legal Science.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 27, no. 1 (February 15, 2015): 179. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15905.

Primadi, Agam, David Efendi, and Sahirin Sahirin. “The Role of Beginner Voters In Oversight Of Participative Election.” Journal of Political Issues 1, no. 1 (July 24, 2019): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.33019/jpi.v1i1.7.

Purnama, Taufiq Yuli, and Ramalina Ranaivo Mikea Manitra. “The Proposal for the Implementation of Elections in Indonesia: A Framework Based on the Presidential System.” Wacana Hukum 29, no. 2 (October 31, 2023): 181–205. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9815.

Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano, and André Borges. “The Populist Challenge: Multi-Level Electoral Coordination in Brazil’s 2018 Elections.” Regional & Federal Studies 30, no. 3 (May 26, 2020): 363–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1694005.

Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano, and Elodie Fabre. “Multilevel Party Organizations in a Fragmented Presidential System: The Case of Brazil.” Regional & Federal Studies 30, no. 4 (August 7, 2020): 525–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1591375.

Rizky, Purnama Ayu. “Pernikahan Politik Indonesia (Studi Kasus Pernikahan Adik Jokowi Dan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi).” POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 2, no. 2 (2022): 104–13. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/politicos/article/view/5265/3841.

Silva, Eugenia Brandao Da, Mahrus Ali, Khabib Syaikhu Rohman, and Mashud Mashud. “A Model of Election Supervision Based on Village Judicial Institutions; A Review of Legal Anthropology in Madura.” Trunojoyo Law Review 6, no. 1 (February 28, 2024): 96–119. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v6i1.23230.

Sukmawan, Denny Indra, and Syaugi Pratama. “Critical Review of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Presidential Threshold.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 4 (December 1, 2023): 556–75. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2041.

Sutopo, Umarwan, Achmad Hasan Basri, and Hilman Rosyidi. “Presidential Threshold in The 2024 Presidential Elections: Implications for The Benefits of Democracy In Indonesia.” Justicia Islamica 21, no. 1 (June 25, 2024): 155–78. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i1.7577.

Syafei, Muhammad, and Muhammad Rafi Darajati. “Design of General Election in Indonesia.” LAW REFORM 16, no. 1 (March 27, 2020): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30308.

Wido Haruni, Catur. “Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election from the Perspective of Constitutional Democracy and State of Law.” In KnE Social Sciences, 408–21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12112.

Zaman, Nurus. “Constitution in Legal Political Perspective.” Trunojoyo Law Review 4, no. 1 (August 8, 2022): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v4i1.16487.

Zimerman, Artur, and Flávio Pinheiro. “Appearances Can Be Deceptive: Political Polarization, Agrarian Policy, and Coalitional Presidentialism in Brazil.” Politics & Policy 48, no. 2 (April 10, 2020): 339–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12345.

Downloads

Published

16-08-2024

How to Cite

Muhammad Zhafran Shobirin, Moh Akbar Adhiyanto, Sholeh Hoddin, and Khabib Syaikhu Rohman. 2024. “A Comparison of Presidential Threshold Systems in Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections in Indonesia and Brazil”. Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 1 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i1.7.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.