The 2020 Amendments of Russia’s 1993 Constitution: A Post-Colonial Interpretation

Authors

  • Herbert Küpper Institute for East European Law, Regensburg (Germany), Managing Director Andrássy University Budapest (Hungary), Chair for European Public Law Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i1.46

Keywords:

Post-colonial Interpretation, Russian Constitution, Democratic Constitutionalism, Amendment

Abstract

In 2020, Russia enacted far-reaching amendments in its Constitution. The classical theory of democratic constitutionalism sees them as a roll-back into an autocratic and isolationist past the reason of which it cannot explain. The objective of this paper is to give the amendments an additional, post-colonial reading in order to fill the gaps of the classic interpretation. Russia was a colonial power (Tsarist Russia, Soviet Union), lost this status in 1991 and has endeavoured to re-create an empire since 2000. Therefore, it can be analysed with the tools that post-colonial theory has formulated in regard to the former metropolis. This is a new interpretional framework for these constitutional amendments. The method is the legal interpretation of a constitutional text against the background of the post-colonial theory of constitution. This post-colonial interpretation provides a coherent reading of these amendments, showing that Russia wants to re-erect its lost empire. For this purpose, it further centralises all state power in the ‘strong-man president’, stresses Russia’s succession into the imperial tradition of Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union, and terminates the binding force of international law within Russia. This post-colonial interpretation of the 2020 amendments of the Russian Constitution does not want to replace the conventional interpretation of democratic constitutionalism but gives an additional angle able to fill the gaps that democratic constitutionalism leaves. Furthermore, it contributes to the post-colonial theory of constitutions because it provides a case study of a former metropolis going imperial again.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Denisov, Sergej. “Das Wesen Und Die Bedeutung Der Änderungen Der Russischen Verfassung Im Jahr 2020.” In Die Reform Der Russischen Verfassung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2020. https://de.book-info.com/isbn/3-8305-5057-X.htm.

Al-Jabassini, Abdullah, and Emadeddin Badi. “The Making of Rivals and Strange Bedfellows: Patterns of Turkish and Russian Security Assistance in the Syrian and Libyan Civil Wars.” Mediterranean Politics 29, no. 4 (August 7, 2024): 501–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2023.2183663.

Avak’ân, Suren Adibekovič. Das Wort “Macht” Sollte Nicht Erschrecken. Jahrbuch Für Ostrecht 61. Regensburg: Institut für Ostrecht, 2021. https://www.ostrecht.de/forschung/publikationen/jahrbuch-fuer-ostrecht/manuskripte/.

Bowring, Bill. “Russian Attitudes to Public International Law.” In The Foundations of Russian Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/foundations-of-russian-law-9781782256489/.

Cap, Piotr. “Narratives of Geopolitical Representation in the Discourse of the Russia–Ukraine War.” Journal of Pragmatics 218 (December 2023): 133–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.10.008.

Choudhry, Sujit, Catherine O’Regan, and Carlos Bernal. “Constitutional Interpretation in the Third Wave: The Importance of Text and Context.” SSRN, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5144004.

Damirov, Javid. “Auswirkungen Der Verfassungsreform Und Der Maßnahmen Gegen Die Covid-19-Pandemie Auf Das Steuersystem Der RF.” Wirtschaft Und Recht in Osteu Ropa 29, no. 11 (2020): 328–31.

Dann, Philipp, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bönnemann, eds. The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law. 1st ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850403.001.0001.

Gaida, F. A. “Power and Opposition in Russia in 1914–February 1917: Why Did the Dialogue Not Take Place?” Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 94, no. S1 (December 2024): S53–63. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331624700059.

Gritsenko, Elena V. “Federalism and Local Self-Government in the Light of Russia’s 2020 Constitutional Reform.” In Dynamics of Contemporary Constitutionalism in Eurasia. Local Legacies and Global Trends. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2022. https://media.dav-medien.de/sample/9783830543893_p.pdf.

Harzl, Benedikt. “Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics.” Review of Central and East European Law 37, no. 1 (2012): 147–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/092598812X13274154886665.

Holland, Steve, and Jeff Mason. “Obama, in Dig at Putin, Calls Russia ‘Regional Power.’” Reuters, March 25, 2014. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/obama-in-dig-at-putin-calls-russia-regional-power-idUSBREA2O19J/.

Jankiewicz, Szymon, Nadezhda Knyaginina, and Federica Prina. “Linguistic Rights and Education in the Republics of the Russian Federation: Towards Unity through Uniformity.” Review of Central and East European Law 45, no. 1 (March 13, 2020): 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10003.

Kangaspuro, Markku. Russia: More Different than Most. 1999: Kikimora, n.d. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269082123776.

Khramova, Tatiana, and Alexandra Troitskaya. “Constitutional Defence Against the ‘Enemies’ of Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Russian Experience.” Russian Law Journal 8, no. 2 (June 19, 2020): 28–48. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-2-28-48.

———. “Russian Constitutional Justice at the Crossroads: The Ambiguous Reform of 2020.” Jahrbuch Für Ostrecht, no. 62 (2021): 83.

Klocker, Cornelia. “Punitive House Burning in Chechnya: Is Collective Punishment Outside Armed Conflict Prohibited?” Review of Central and East European Law 44, no. 1 (March 28, 2019): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04401002.

Kluczewska, Karolina, and Kristiina Silvan. “Post-Soviet Dependence with Benefits? Critical Geopolitics of Belarus’s and Tajikistan’s Strategic Alignment with Russia.” Geopolitics 30, no. 2 (March 15, 2025): 641–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2368621.

Kolstø, Pål. “Authoritarian Diffusion, or the Geopolitics of Self-Interest? Evidence from Russia’s Patron–Client Relations with Eurasia’s De Facto States.” Europe-Asia Studies 73, no. 5 (May 28, 2021): 890–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1806209.

Komarek, J. “Waiting for the Existential Revolution in Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 1 (January 1, 2014): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou004.

Krisch, Nico. “International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order.” European Journal of International Law 16, no. 3 (June 1, 2005): 369–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi123.

Küpper, Herbert. “Die Bedeutung Der EMRK in Demokratien Im Umbruch.” In Demokratie Und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention. Viena: MANZ´sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 2019.

———. Fit Für Den Neo-Imperialismus? Postkoloniale Verfassungstheorie Als Erklärungsansatz Der Russischen Verfassungsänderungen von 2020. Jahrbuch Für Ostrecht 63. Regensburg: Institut für Ostrecht, 2022. https://www.ostrecht.de/forschung/publikationen/jahrbuch-fuer-ostrecht/manuskripte/.

———. “Russia’s Constitutional Amendments of 2020 Read through the Post-Colonial Lens : Do the Amendments Pave the Way for Russia to Become a Colonial Power Again?” Center for Asian Legal Exchange, Nagoya University (CALE), February 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.18999/calealb.8.21.

———. “The Concept of Multilayered Statehood in the System of Russian Federalism.” Review of Central and East European Law 38, no. 3–4 (2013): 239–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-00000003.

———. “The Indonesian Constitution Read with German Eyes.” Constitutional Review 7, no. 1 (May 31, 2021): 53. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev713.

Luchterhandt, Otto. “Vladimir Putin schafft Klarheit: Präsident Russlands de facto auf Lebenszeit,” February 15, 2020. https://www.ostinstitut.de/documents/Luchterhandt_Vladimir_Putin_schafft_Klarheit_Prsident_Russlands_de_facto_auf_Lebenszeit_Teil_1_OL_1_2020.pdf.

———. “Zwei Prominente Publizisten Russlands Über Putins Verfassungscoup.” In Die Reform Der Russischen Verfassung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2020. https://de.book-info.com/isbn/3-8305-5057-X.htm.

Maher, David, and Moritz Pieper. “Russian Intervention in Syria: Exploring the Nexus between Regime Consolidation and Energy Transnationalisation.” Political Studies 69, no. 4 (November 2021): 944–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720934637.

Malfliet, Katlijn. Rusland Na de Sovjet-Unie: Een Normaal Land? Leuven: Lannoo Campus, 2004.

Marochkin, Sergey Yu. The Operation of International Law in the Russian Legal System: A Changing Approach. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391017.

Morton, Stephen. Gayatri Spivak: Ethics, Subalternity and the Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Malden, MA: Polity, 2007. https://philpapers.org/rec/MORGSE.

Northmore-Ball, Ksenia, and Katerina Tertytchnaya. “The Long-Term Effects of Voting for Autocracy: Evidence from Russia.” Electoral Studies 83 (June 2023): 102618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102618.

Partlett, William. “Crown-Presidentialism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 1 (July 27, 2022): 204–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac006.

———. “Russian Crown-Presidentialism.” Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional, April 20, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17176/20220420-182405-0.

———. “Russia’s 2020 Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Analysis.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 23 (December 2021): 311–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2021.7.

———. Why the Russian Constitution Matters: The Constitutional Dark Arts. 1st ed. Hart Publishing, 2024. https://www.perlego.com/book/4506399/why-the-russian-constitution-matters-the-constitutional-dark-arts-pdf.

Partlett, William, and Mikhail Krasnov. “Russia’s Non-Transformative Constitutional Founding.” European Constitutional Law Review 15, no. 4 (December 2019): 644–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000403.

Partlett, William, and Herbert Küpper. The Post-Soviet as Post-Colonial: A New Paradigm for Understanding Constitutional Dynamics in the Former Soviet Empire. Elgar Monographs in Constitutional and Administrative Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802209440.

Prozorova, Yulia. “Democracy Revised: Democratic Imaginary and Emerging Autocracy in Post-Soviet Russia.” American Behavioral Scientist 68, no. 13 (November 2024): 1683–1702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241267937.

Pupcenoks, Juris, and Eric James Seltzer. “Russian Strategic Narratives on R2P in the ‘Near Abroad.’” Nationalities Papers 49, no. 4 (July 2021): 757–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.54.

Sadowski, Jakub. “Amendments of 2020 to the Russian Constitution as an Update to Its Symbolic and Identity Programme.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35, no. 2 (April 2022): 723–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09802-w.

Simon, Gerhard. “Die Russen Und Die Demokratie: Zur Politischen Kultur in Rußland.” In Politische Und Ökonomische Transformation in Osteuropa. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2000. https://doc1.bibliothek.li/aau/000A093239.pdf.

Spohr, Kristina, and Kaarel Piirimäe. “With or without Russia? The Boris, Bill and Helmut Bromance and the Harsh Realities of Securing Europe in the Post-Wall World, 1990-1994.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 33, no. 1 (January 2, 2022): 158–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2022.2041816.

The Russian Federation. Constitution of the Russian Federation of 12 December 1993, 1-FKZ § (2020).

V. Salenko, Alexander. “Völkerrechtliche Bezüge Der Verfassungsreform 2020.” In Die Reform Der Russischen Verfassung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2020. https://www.steiner-verlag.de/brand/Deutsch-Russische-Rechtszeitschrift.

Valenza, Domenico. “Russia’s Cultural Diplomacy in Post-Soviet Space: The Making of ‘One People.’” Eurasian Geography and Economics 64, no. 4 (May 19, 2023): 399–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2022.2025880.

Wedde, Rainer. “Ein Abbild Der Realität? Die Version 2020 Der Russischen Verfassung.” In Die Reform Der Russischen Verfassung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2020.

Whittington, Anna. “Contested Privilege: Ethnic Russians and the Unmaking of the Soviet Union.” The Journal of Modern History 95, no. 4 (December 1, 2023): 887–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/727478.

Wieser, Bernd. Handbuch Der Russischen Verfassung - Ergänzungsband Zur Novelle 2020. BiblioScout, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33196/9783704689559.

Zavershinskaia, Polina. “‘Why Do We Need a World without Russia in It?’ Discursive Justifications of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in Russia and Germany.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 29, no. 2 (April 3, 2023): 129–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2023.2199927.

Zevelev, Igor A. “Russia in the Post-Soviet Space: Dual Citizenship as a Foreign Policy Instrument.” Russia in Global Affairs 19, no. 2 (2021): 10–37. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-2-10-37.

Downloads

Published

10-03-2025

How to Cite

Herbert Küpper. 2025. “The 2020 Amendments of Russia’s 1993 Constitution: A Post-Colonial Interpretation”. Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 2 (1): 37-59. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i1.46.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.