Adopting Distributive and Compensatory Justice to Determine Optimal Tax Treatment for Corporate Donations

Authors

  • Younis A. Battal Saleh The Court of Appeal in Benghazi; General Electricity Company of Libya, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v3i1.229

Keywords:

Corporate Philanthropy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Distributive and Compensatory Justice, Tax Incentives

Abstract

This study aims to demonstrate how to determine the tax treatment of corporate donations in a scientifically correct manner that ensures the following: First, tax justice among donor companies. Second, justice and equality of rights among stakeholders. Third, avoiding the distortion of the thought of CSR. This study adopts the concepts of distributive and compensatory justice to determine optimal tax treatments for corporate donations. Evaluating corporate donations on the ground is essential to determine tax treatment under this approach. Based on the results of the evaluation, the following actions are taken: First, forming logical perceptions that reflect the explicit and implicit meanings of donations as they are in reality. Second, determining the type of justice (distributive or compensatory) that should be adopted as the basis for tax treatment. Using a distributive and compensatory justice approach that is based primarily on rational evaluation, this research article identified "seven possible scenarios" for the tax treatment of corporate donations. The central idea of using distributive and compensatory justice as a philosophical foundation for differentiating tax treatments is a significant and original contribution. It moves the debate beyond the simplistic "incentive or no incentive" question to a more nuanced inquiry: "what kind of tax treatment, for what kind of company, under what circumstances?". The proposed seven scenarios and the structured evaluation framework provide a powerful and justifiable foundation for policymakers to design more equitable and sophisticated tax systems. This approach could genuinely inform global tax reforms. Adopting a distributive and compensatory justice approach to determining optimal tax treatments for corporate donations can help protect the concept of CSR from distortion.

References

Abodher, Fareg Mustafa, Mohamed Elmagrhi, and Mohamed A. Shlof. “National Pride, Trust in Government and Tax Compliance: Evidence from an Environment of Severe Political Instability.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 26, no. 5 (October 31, 2025): 1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-11-2023-0335.

Abraham, Diya, Luca Corazzini, Miloš Fišar, and Tommaso Reggiani. “Coordinating Donations via an Intermediary: The Destructive Effect of a Sunk Overhead Cost.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 211 (July 2023): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.006.

Akey, Pat, and Ian Appel. “The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution.” The Journal of Finance 76, no. 1 (February 13, 2021): 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12978.

Asaduzzaman, Mohammed, and Petri Virtanen. “Strong, Transparent Public Institutions and Meta-Governance.” In Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 889–900. Cham: Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3_125.

Asatryan, Zareh, and David Joulfaian. “Taxes and Business Philanthropy in Armenia.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 200 (August 2022): 914–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.008.

Ashrafi, Mehrnaz, Gregory M. Magnan, Michelle Adams, and Tony R. Walker. “Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability.” Sustainability 12, no. 3 (January 21, 2020): 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760.

Ayvaz Çavdaroğlu, Nur. “Joint Pricing and Ordering Problem with Charitable Donations.” Sustainability 12, no. 17 (August 26, 2020): 6950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176950.

Butz, Britta, and Christine Harbring. “Donations as an Incentive for Cooperation in Public Good Games.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 85 (April 2020): 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101510.

Col, Burcin, and Saurin Patel. “Going to Haven? Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Avoidance.” Journal of Business Ethics 154, no. 4 (February 9, 2019): 1033–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3393-2.

Dao, Ngoc, and J Michael Collins. “The Impact of State Income Tax Breaks on Savings and Income Security in Retirement.” Edited by Kevin Cahill. Work, Aging and Retirement, February 11, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaf001.

Dauvergne, Peter. “The Power of Environmental Norms: Marine Plastic Pollution and The Politics of Microbeads.” Environmental Politics 27, no. 4 (July 4, 2018): 579–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1449090.

Davis, Angela K., David A. Guenther, Linda K. Krull, and Brian M. Williams. “Do Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes?” The Accounting Review 91, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 47–68. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51224.

Faulk, Lewis, Sheela Pandey, Sanjay K. Pandey, and Kristen Scott Kennedy. “Donors’ Responses to Profit Incentives in the Social Sector: The Entrepreneurial Orientation Reward and the Profit Penalty.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 39, no. 1 (January 7, 2020): 218–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22179.

Fernández-Vázquez, José-Santiago, and Roberto-Carlos Álvarez-Delgado. “The Interaction between Rational Arguments and Emotional Appeals in the Entrepreneurial Pitch.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 26, no. 3 (October 15, 2019): 503–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0334.

Folléa, G. “Donor Compensation and Remuneration – Is There Really a Difference?” ISBT Science Series 11, no. S1 (January 29, 2016): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/voxs.12188.

Gordon, E.J., C.H. Patel, M.-W. Sohn, B. Hippen, and L.A. Sherman. “Does Financial Compensation for Living Kidney Donation Change Willingness to Donate?” American Journal of Transplantation 15, no. 1 (February 2015): 265–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13004.

Lanis, Roman, and Grant Richardson. “Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?” Journal of Business Ethics 127, no. 2 (March 18, 2015): 439–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2052-8.

Li, Weibing, Siyuan Chen, and Kaixia Zhang. “Responsible Behavior of Irresponsible Companies: Air Pollution and Charitable Donations of Polluting Companies.” China & World Economy 31, no. 4 (July 7, 2023): 90–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12490.

Lindauer, Matthew, Marcus Mayorga, Joshua Greene, Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll, and Peter Singer. “Comparing the Effect of Rational and Emotional Appeals on Donation Behavior.” Judgment and Decision Making 15, no. 3 (May 1, 2020): 413–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007208.

Masulis, Ronald W., and Syed Walid Reza. “Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy.” Review of Financial Studies 28, no. 2 (February 2015): 592–636. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu082.

Mazodier, Marc, Francois Anthony Carrillat, Claire Sherman, and Carolin Plewa. “Can Donations Be Too Little or Too Much?” European Journal of Marketing 55, no. 1 (January 4, 2021): 271–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2019-0278.

McCarty, Sean, and Jane L. Sumner. “The Political Consequences of Corporate Donations for Public Service Provision.” Business and Politics 26, no. 1 (March 4, 2024): 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2023.27.

Mohamed, Salh Agrerah Ali, Morni Hayati Jaafar Sidik, and Haslina Hassan. “How Political Instability Affects Tax Evasion Behavior Among Self-Employed Individuals: A Libyan Case Study.” In Transforming Business Systems for Strategic Success. Studies in Systems, 47–54. Cham: Springer, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95280-7_5.

Oke, Olasunkanmi Olawale, R Adetola, and Abdulah Shuaib. “Corporate Social Responsibility Practice and Company Income Tax Payment in Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria.” Journal of Human Resources and Management Science, June 19, 2025. https://doi.org/10.70382/hujhrms.v8i7.022.

Pandapotan, Fransisco. “The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Tax Avoidance.” Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research 2, no. 3 (February 28, 2023): 258–65. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v2i3.158.

Saleh, Younis A. Battal. “Advantages and Disadvantages of the Six Methods of Tax Treatment of Corporate Donations: A Theoretical Study of Intellectual Enrichment in the Fields of Taxation and CSR.” International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-4931.0501001.

Sottini, Andrea, and Giacomo Ciambotti. “Social Entrepreneurship Toward a Sustainable Peacebuilding.” In Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 841–51. Cham: Springer Cham, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95960-3_128.

Sun, Hongfeng, Meng Yang, Lidan Li, and Chang Liu. “Corporate Charitable Donations, Earnings Performance and Tax Avoidance.” Sustainability 15, no. 4 (February 8, 2023): 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043116.

Szőcs, Ilona, Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, Thomas Rusch, and Hamed M. Shamma. “Linking Cause Assessment, Corporate Philanthropy, and Corporate Reputation.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44, no. 3 (May 11, 2016): 376–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0417-2.

Wang, Caiping, Honggang Xu, and Gang Li. “The Corporate Philanthropy and Legitimacy Strategy of Tourism Firms: A Community Perspective.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 26, no. 7 (July 3, 2018): 1124–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1428334.

Zhang, Kuangjie, Fengyan Cai, and Zhengyu Shi. “Do Promotions Make Consumers More Generous? The Impact of Price Promotions on Consumers’ Donation Behavior.” Journal of Marketing 85, no. 3 (May 4, 2021): 240–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920988253.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

A. Battal Saleh, Younis. 2026. “Adopting Distributive and Compensatory Justice to Determine Optimal Tax Treatment for Corporate Donations”. Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 3 (1): 70-93. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v3i1.229.

Similar Articles

11-17 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.